In: Motivation and Emotion, 2015, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 680-692
|
In: The Web Conference 2021, Ljubljana, Slovenia, April 12-23, 2021, 2021, p. 1-12
Scientific peer review is pivotal to maintain quality standards for academic publication. The effectiveness of the reviewing process is currently being challenged by the rapid increase of paper submissions in various conferences. Those venues need to recruit a large number of reviewers of different levels of expertise and background. The submitted reviews often do not meet the conformity...
|
In: Basic Research in Cardiology, 2014, vol. 109, no. 1, p. 1-15
|
In: Higher Education, 2014, vol. 68, no. 3, p. 333-345
|
In: Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 93-97
|
In: Scientometrics, 2005, vol. 63, no. 2, p. 297-320
|
In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2006, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 311-312
|
In: Scientometrics, 2005, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 391-392
|
In: Scientometrics, 2010, vol. 83, no. 2, p. 493-506
|
In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2005, vol. 12, no. 2, p. S58-S59
|