Fulltext

Guidelines for consistent reporting of exchanges/to nature within life cycle inventories (LCI)

Hischier, Roland ; Baitz, Martin ; Bretz, Rolf ; Frischknecht, Rolf ; Jungbluth, Niels ; Marheineke, Torsten ; McKeown, Phil ; Oele, Michiel ; Osset, Philippe ; Renner, Isa ; Skone, Tim ; Wessman, Helena ; de Beaufort, Angeline

In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 192-198

Ajouter à la liste personnelle
    Titre
    • Guidelines for consistent reporting of exchanges/to nature within life cycle inventories (LCI)
    Auteur
    • Hischier, Roland. EMPA, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014, St. Gallen, Switzerland
    • Baitz, Martin. University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 32, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany
    • Bretz, Rolf. Ciba Speciality Chemicals Inc., 4002, Basel, Switzerland
    • Frischknecht, Rolf. ESU-services, Kanzleistrasse 4, 8610, Uster, Switzerland
    • Jungbluth, Niels. ESU-services, Kanzleistrasse 4, 8610, Uster, Switzerland
    • Marheineke, Torsten. University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 31, 70550, Stuttgart, Germany
    • McKeown, Phil. Unilever, Port Sunlight, Wirral, UK
    • Oele, Michiel. PRé Consultants, Plotterweg 12, 3821, Amersfoort, Netherlands
    • Osset, Philippe. PriceWaterhouseCooper/Ecobilan, 75000, Paris, France
    • Renner, Isa. C.A.U., Daimlerstrasse 23, 63303, Dreieich, Germany
    • Skone, Tim. SAIC, 11251 Roger Bacon Drive, 20190, Reston, Virginia, USA
    • Wessman, Helena. KCL, Tekniikantie 2, 02151, Espoo, Finland
    • de Beaufort, Angeline. FEFCO-GO-KI, Graeterweg 13, 6071 ND, Swalmen, Netherlands
    Type de document
    • Postprint
    Langue
    • Anglais
    Publié dans
    • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 192-198. Ecomed
    Autre version électronique
    Identifiant OAI-PMH
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:322431
    Summary
    Data availability and data quality are still critical factors for successful LCA work. The SETAC-Europe LCA Working Group ‘Data Availability and Data Quality' has therefore focused on ongoing developments toward a common data exchange format, public databases and accepted quality measures to find science-based solutions than can be widely accepted. A necessary prerequisite for the free flow and exchange of life cycle inventory (LCI) data and the comparability of LCIs is the consistent definition, nomenclature, and use of inventory parameters. This is the main subject of the subgroup ‘Recommended List of Exchanges' that presents its results and findings here: • Rigid parameter lists for LCIs are not practical; especially, compulsory lists of measurements for all inventories are counterproductive. Instead, practitioners should be obliged to give the rationale for their scientific choice of selected and omitted parameters. The standardized (not: mandatory!) parameter list established by the subgroup can help to facilitate this. • The standardized nomenclature of LCI parameters and the standardized list of measurement bases (units) for these parameters need not be appliedinternally (e.g. in LCA software), but should be adhered to inexternal communications (data for publication and exchange). Deviations need to be clearly stated. • Sum parameters may or may not overlap - misinterpretations in either direction introduce a bias of unknown significance in the subsequent life cycle impact assessments (LCIA). The only person who can discriminate unambiguously is the practitioner who measures or calculates such values. Therefore, a clear statement of independence or overlap is necessary for every sum parameter reported. • Sum parameters should be only used when the group of emissions as such is measured. Individually measured emission parameters should not be hidden in group or sum parameters. • Problematic substances (such as carcinogens, ozone depleting agents and the like) maynever be obscured in group emissions (together with less harmful substances or with substances of different environmental impact), butmust be determined and reported individually, as mentioned in paragraph 3.3 of this article. • Mass and energy balances should be carried out on a unit process level. Mass balances should be done on the level of the entire mass flow in a process as well as on the level of individual chemical elements. • Whenever possible, practitioners should try to fill data gaps with their knowledge of analogous processes, environmental expert judgements, mass balance calculations, worst case assumptions or similar estimation procedures