In: Theory and Decision, 2015, vol. 79, no. 4, p. 573-600
|
In: Economic Theory, 2015, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 59-71
|
In: Theory and Decision, 2015, vol. 78, no. 2, p. 189-208
|
In: IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2017, vol. 37, no. 3, p. 1087-1103
|
In: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2019, vol. 37, no. 4, p. 710-720
We propose a difference-in-differences approach for disentangling a total treatment effect within specific subpopulations into a direct effect and an indirect effect operating through a binary mediating variable. Random treatment assignment along with specific common trend and effect homogeneity assumptions identify the direct effects on the always and never takers, whose mediator is not...
|
In: Social Choice and Welfare, 2014, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 735-750
We characterize the outcome of majority voting for single-peaked preferences on median spaces. This large class of preferences covers a variety of multi-dimensional policy spaces including products of lines (e.g. grids), trees, and hypercubes. Our main result is the following: If a Condorcet winner (i.e. a winner in pairwise majority voting) exists, then it coincides with the appropriately...
|
In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2010, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 147-180
|
In: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 363-374
|
In: Economic Theory, 2006, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 665-679
|
In: manuscripta mathematica, 2004, vol. 114, no. 3, p. 351-359
|