In: Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, vol. 129, no. 1, p. 221-236
|
In: Climatic Change, 2015, vol. 133, no. 3, p. 469-480
|
In: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2015, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 853-866
|
In: Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, p. 881–897
Expanding the debate about empathy with human beings, animals, or fictional characters to include human-robot relationships, this paper proposes two different perspectives from which to assess the scope and limits of empathy with robots: the first is epistemological, while the second is normative. The epistemological approach helps us to clarify whether we can empathize with artificial...
|
In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, vol. 20, no. 8, p. 2175–2193
Evidence of observed negative impacts on natural and human systems from anthropogenic climate change is increasing. However, human systems in particular are dynamic and influenced by multiple drivers and hence identifying an anthropogenic climate signal is challenging. Here we analyze the case of lake Palcacocha in the Andes of Peru, which offers a representative model for other glacier lakes...
|
In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, vol. 39, p. 147–152
Adaptation to changing and new environmental conditions is of fundamental importance to sustainability and requires concerted efforts amongst science, policy, and practice to produce solution-oriented knowledge. Joint knowledge production or co-production of knowledge have become increasingly popular terms to describe the process of scientists, policy makers and actors from the civil society...
|
In: International Yearbook for Tillich Research, 2015, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 19-40
|
In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2016, vol. 64, no. 3, p. 424-448
|
In: KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2014, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 263-269
|
In: Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, vol. 123, no. 1, p. 23-43
|