In: Oecologia, 2015, vol. 179, no. 3, p. 765-775
|
In: Tree Physiology, ///-
|
In: Annals of Forest Science, 2015, vol. 72, no. 3, p. 303-309
|
In: Microbial Ecology, 2015, vol. 69, no. 4, p. 826-842
|
In: Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2015, vol. 51, no. 6, p. 749-755
|
In: Biogeochemistry, 2015, vol. 123, no. 1-2, p. 285-297
|
In: Tree Physiology, 2016, vol. 36, no. 11, p. 1-3
|
In: Biological Invasions, 2015, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1407-1423
|
In: Tree Physiology, 2016, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 78-85
|
In: Genome Biology and Evolution, 2020, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1167–1173
Rapid evolution of weed biological control agents (BCAs) to new biotic and abiotic conditions is poorly understood and so far only little considered both in pre-release and post-release studies, despite potential major negative or positive implications for risks of nontargeted attacks or for colonizing yet unsuitable habitats, respectively. Provision of genetic resources, such as assembled...
|