In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2016, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1638-1649
|
In: Brain Structure and Function, 2015, vol. 220, no. 6, p. 3537-3553
|
In: Brain, 2016, vol. 139, no. 6, p. 1855-1861
|
In: Brain Topography, 2015, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 66-69
|
In: International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 809-813
|
In: Brain Structure and Function, 2015, vol. 220, no. 4, p. 2121-2142
|
In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2016, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1428-1439
|
In: Cerebral Cortex, 2020, vol. 30, no. 8, p. 4481–4495
Many studies have implicated the basal forebrain (BF) as a potent regulator of sensory encoding even at the earliest stages of or cortical processing. The source of this regulation involves the well-documented corticopetal cholinergic projections from BF to primary cortical areas. However, the BF also projects to subcortical structures, including the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), which...
|
In: Neuroscience, 2019, vol. 421, p. 82–94
Training inhibitory control, the ability to suppress motor or cognitive processes, not only enhances inhibition processes, but also reduces the perceived value and behaviors toward the stimuli associated with the inhibition goals during the practice. While these findings suggest that inhibitory control training interacts with the aversive and reward systems, the underlying spatio-temporal...
|
In: Brain and Cognition, 2019, vol. 132, p. 22–32
Inhibitory control deficits represent a key aspect of the cognitive declines associated with aging. Practicing inhibitory control has thus been advanced as a potential approach to compensate for age-induced neurocognitive impairments. Yet, the functional brain changes associated with practicing inhibitory control tasks in older adults and whether they differ from those observed in young...
|