In: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012, vol. 404, no. 6-7, p. 1831-1838
|
In: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010, vol. 396, no. 7, p. 2523-2532
|
In: Forensic Toxicology, 2013, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 151-163
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, vol. 126, no. 2, p. 243-250
|
In: Chromatographia, 2013, vol. 76, no. 19-20, p. 1281-1293
|
In: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012, vol. 402, no. 8, p. 2485-2498
|
In: European Heart Journal, 2011, vol. 32, no. 11, p. 1369-1378
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2001, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 209-214
|
In: European Heart Journal, 2013, vol. 34, no. 27, p. 2063-2073
|
In: Drug Testing and Analysis, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1-2, p. 155–163
Some forensic and clinical circumstances require knowledge of the frequency of drug use. Care of the patient, administrative, and legal consequences will be different if the subject is a regular or an occasional cannabis smoker. To this end, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) has been proposed as a criterion to help to distinguish between these two groups of users. However, to...
|