In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 1959-1971
|
In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 1993-1993
|
In: Behavior Research Methods, 2011, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 864-878
|
In: Experimental Brain Research, 2004, vol. 159, no. 3, p. 389-399
|
In: Brain, 2003, vol. 126, no. 11, p. 2381-2395
|
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 438-439
|
In: Cerebral Cortex, 2006, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 574-586
|
In: Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2011, vol. 5, no. 156, p. 1-3
|
In: Psychological Science, 2011, vol. 22, no. 12, p. 1518-1526
The main concern in face-processing research is to understand the processes underlying the identification of faces. In the study reported here, we addressed this issue by examining whether local or global information supports face identification. We developed a new methodology called “iHybrid.” This technique combines two famous identities in a gaze-contingent paradigm, which...
|
In: PLoS ONE, 2010, vol. 5, no. 3, p. e9708
Background: Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eyes during face recognition, whereas Easterners more the nose region, yet recognition accuracy is comparable. However, natural fixations do not unequivocally represent information extraction. So the question of whether humans universally use identical facial...
|
