In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2014, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 145-159
|
In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2007, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 121-142
|
In: Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2008, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 89-105
|
In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2013, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 107-116
|
In: Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 2007, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 121-142
In this paper we propose an application-independent model for the definition of artificial institutions that can be used to define open multi-agent systems. Such a model of institutional reality makes us able also to define an objective and external semantics of a commitment-based Agent Communication Language (ACL). In particular we propose to regard an ACL as a set of conventions to act on a...
|
In: AI communications, 2010, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 341-356
Monitoring the temporal evolution of obligations and prohibitions is a crucial aspect in the design of open interaction systems. In this paper we regard such obligations and prohibitions as cases of social commitment with starting points and deadlines, and propose to model them in OWL, the logical language recommended by the W3C for SemanticWeb applications. In particular we propose an...
|
In: Applied artificial intelligence, 2004/18/9/10/853-866
In this paper we propose an operational method for the definition of the semantics of Agent Communication Languages based on the notion of social commitment. Our proposal is suitable for open interaction frameworks where agents, designed by independent constructors, dynamically enter and leave different interaction systems. In this type of environments it is crucial to define a standard and...
|
In: Journal of pragmatics, 2009, vol. 41, no. 9, p. 1837-1854
In this paper we want to reconcile two apparently conflicting intuitions: the first is that what a speaker means is just a function of his or her communicative intentions, independently of what the hearer understands, and even of the actual existence of a hearer; the second is that when communication is carried out successfully, the resulting meaning is, in some important sense, jointly construed...
|
In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 2005, vol. XXVII, p. 384-389
We delineate a theory of communicative acts as situated actions, through which agents co-construct the current situation by creating or otherwise manipulating deontic affordances. We rely on Gilbert’s theory of plural subjects to introduce the concept of joint meaning as a type of joint commitment. We then show that our approach allows for an innovative treatment of indirect speech.
|
The specification of open interaction systems, which may be dynamically entered and left by autonomous agents, is widely recognized to be a crucial issue in the development of distributed applications on the internet. The specification of such systems involves two main problems: the first is the definition of a standard way of specifying a communication language for the interacting agents and...
|