In: Dal conflitto al dialogo. Un approccio comunicativo alla mediazione, 2020, p. vii-x
|
In: Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2020, vol. 69, no. 1, p. 69-94
Adversative connectives have been analyzed as articulating explicit and implicit facets of argumentative moves and have been thus recognized as potential argumentative indicators. Here we examine adversative connectives Ger. aber, Fr. mais, It. ma (‘but’) in young children’s speech in the context of the ArgImp project, a research endeavor seeking to understand in which...
|
In: Idées pratiques. Le guide pour faire la transition, 2020, vol. 1, p. 6-7
|
In: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2019, vol. 53, no. 4, p. 679-693
Referring to the notion of “possible worlds”, the paper aims to investigate an intriguing aspect of children’s thinking: the function that play narrative scenarios in sharing with other partners (peers and adults) the child’s understanding of the physical and social reality. The idea of possible worlds to which this work relates, can be considered in some way as the legacy of Piaget’s...
|
In: Agir et penser. Avec Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 2019, p. 127-145
|
In: Agir et penser. Avec Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 2019, p. 109-126
|
In: Agir et penser. Avec Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 2019, p. 71-107
|
In: Agir et penser. Avec Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 2019, p. 33-70
|
In: Entrer dans la société de longue vie, 2019, p. 228-230
|
In: Argumentation in actual practice. Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, 2019, p. 211-236
When two- to six-year-old children contribute to argumentative discussion, how do they reason? Can Argumentation theory, a discipline that up to now has largely focused on adult expert productions, contribute to a psychological understanding of the child? And, in turn, can a close examination of children's argumentative moves contribute to the study of inference in argumentation? Our...
|
