In: European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2010, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 449-472
|
In: Иновације у настави / Teaching Innovations, 2017, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 49-67
Cette étude porte sur des séances de travail entre un enseignant spécialisé et un enseignant généraliste qui collaborent dans le cadre d’une classe inclusive. Les enseignants nous ont procuré des enregistrements audio de leurs séances et accepté de participer à des entretiens individuels sur celles-ci. L’analyse conversationnelle de la séance montre que les enseignants...
|
In: Actes de la recherche, 2017, no. 11, p. 103-119
|
In: Language in Society, 2009, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 137-138
|
In: Actes de la Recherche, 2014, no. 10, p. 147-156
|
In: Actes de la Recherche, 2014, no. 10, p. 11-25
|
In: Discourse studies, 2013, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 713-734
Questions represent a crucial tool of interaction between parents and children from a very early age. This study aims to investigate which function – argumentative or explanatory – most characterizes Why-questions asked by children to their parents in a natural setting such as mealtimes at home. Why- questions asked by 13 children – eight girls and five boys aged between three and seven...
|
In: Appetite, 2014, vol. 73, p. 81-94
At mealtimes, the evaluation of the appropriate (or not appropriate) behavior concerning the food is often assumed as a topic of discourse. The aim of this study is to single out the argumentative strategies used by parents with their children and by children with their parents in order to convince the other party to eat or not to eat a certain food. Within a data corpus constituted by 30...
|
In: Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 2014, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 43-66
This study aims to single out the argumentative strategies most frequently used by parents to convince their children to accept their rules and prescriptions at mealtimes. The results of thestudy show that parents mostly put forward arguments based on the quality and quantity of food to persuade their childern to eat. Less frequently, the parents put forward other types of arguments such as...
|
In: Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2013, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 206-224
This paper is centred on family conversations and focuses on the conditions that allow a specific strategic maneuver, the invocation of the authority, to be an effective argumentative strategy when used by parents to convince their children to accept rules and prescriptions. Within a corpus of argumentative sequences selected from 30 video-recordings of family mealtime conversations, an...
|
