Fulltext

Shrinkage and restrained shrinkage cracking of self-compacting concrete compared to conventionally vibrated concrete

Loser, R. ; Leemann, A.

In: Materials and Structures, 2009, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 71-82

Add to personal list
    Title
    • Shrinkage and restrained shrinkage cracking of self-compacting concrete compared to conventionally vibrated concrete
    Author
    • Loser, R.. Laboratory for Concrete/Construction Chemistry, Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research), Überlandstr. 129, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland
    • Leemann, A.. Laboratory for Concrete/Construction Chemistry, Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research), Überlandstr. 129, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland
    Document Type
    • Postprint
    OAI-PMH Identifier
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:321091
    Summary
    Self-compacting concrete (SCC) used in Switzerland contains about 80l/m3 more volume of paste than conventionally vibrated concrete (CVC). Consequently, there are some systematic differences in the properties of the hardened concrete. Normally, shrinkage of SCC is higher than shrinkage of CVC. Therefore, risk of cracking in case of restrained deformations can be increased for SCC. In this study shrinkage of thirteen different SCC mixtures using volume of paste, water content, type of binder, grain size distribution or content of shrinkage reducing admixture (SRA) as variables was compared with shrinkage of three different CVC mixtures with constant volume of paste but variable w/b. Furthermore, the risk of cracking of the different SCC- and CVC-mixtures in restrained conditions was studied under constant and varying curing conditions. The results show that shrinkage is mainly depending on volume of paste. Due to the higher volume of paste, SCC displayed higher shrinkage than CVC. Adding an SRA was the only measure to reduce shrinkage of SCC to values of CVC. Restrained shrinkage cracking is depending on shrinkage rate, mechanical properties and drying velocity. For slow shrinkage stress development, cracking risk of SCC can be lower compared to CVC despite the higher shrinkage rate