Fulltext

Comparison of fundus autofluorescence images acquired by the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (488nm excitation) and the modified Topcon fundus camera (580nm excitation)

Deli, A. ; Moetteli, L. ; Ambresin, A. ; Mantel, I.

In: International Ophthalmology, 2013, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 635-643

Ajouter à la liste personnelle
    Titre
    • Comparison of fundus autofluorescence images acquired by the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (488nm excitation) and the modified Topcon fundus camera (580nm excitation)
    Auteur
    • Deli, A.. Ophthalmology Department of the University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, 15 Av. de France—Case postale 133, 1000, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
    • Moetteli, L.. Ophthalmology Department of the University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, 15 Av. de France—Case postale 133, 1000, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
    • Ambresin, A.. Ophthalmology Department of the University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, 15 Av. de France—Case postale 133, 1000, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
    • Mantel, I.. Ophthalmology Department of the University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, 15 Av. de France—Case postale 133, 1000, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
    Type de document
    • Postprint
    Langue
    • Anglais
    Publié dans
    • International Ophthalmology, 2013, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 635-643. Springer Netherlands
    Autre version électronique
    Identifiant OAI-PMH
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:319145
    Summary
    To compare autofluorescence (AF) images obtained with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (using the Heidelberg retina angiograph; HRA) and the modified Topcon fundus camera, in a routine clinical setting. A prospective comparative study conducted at the Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital. Fifty-six patients from the medical retina clinic. All patients had complete ophthalmic slit-lamp and fundus examinations, colour and red-free fundus photography, AF imaging with both instruments, and fluorescein angiography. Cataract and fixation were graded clinically. AF patterns were analyzed for healthy and pathological features. Differences of image noise were analyzed by cataract grading and fixation. A total of 105 eyes were included. AF patterns discovered by the retina angiograph and the fundus camera images, respectively, were a dark optic disc in 72% versus 15%, a dark fovea in 92% versus 4%, sub- and intraretinal fluid visible as hyperautofluorescence on HRA images only, lipid exudates visible as hypoautofluorescence on HRA images only. The same autofluorescent pattern was found on both images for geographic atrophy, retinal pigment changes, drusen and haemorrhage. Image noise was significantly associated with the degree of cataract and/or poor fixation, favouring the fundus camera. Images acquired by the fundus camera before and after fluorescein angiography were identical. Fundus AF images differ according to the technical differences of the instruments used. Knowledge of these differences is important not only for correctly interpreting images, but also for selecting the most appropriate instrument for the clinical situation