Fulltext

Patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study

Vignaux, Laurence ; Vargas, Frédéric ; Roeseler, Jean ; Tassaux, Didier ; Thille, Arnaud ; Kossowsky, Michel ; Brochard, Laurent ; Jolliet, Philippe

In: Intensive Care Medicine, 2009, vol. 35, no. 5, p. 840-846

Zum persönliche Liste hinzufügen
    Titel
    • Patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study
    Autor
    • Vignaux, Laurence. Service des Soins Intensifs, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Vargas, Frédéric. Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
    • Roeseler, Jean. Service des Soins Intensifs, Cliniques Universitaires St.-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
    • Tassaux, Didier. Service des Soins Intensifs, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Thille, Arnaud. Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
    • Kossowsky, Michel. Service de Médecine de Premier Recours, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Brochard, Laurent. Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
    • Jolliet, Philippe. Service des Soins Intensifs, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    Dokumententyp
    • Postprint
    Sprache
    • Englisch
    Veröffentlicht in
    • Intensive Care Medicine, 2009, vol. 35, no. 5, p. 840-846. Springer-Verlag
    Andere elektronische Ausgabe
    OAI-PMH-ID
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:313124
    Summary
    Objective : To determine the prevalence of patient-ventilator asynchrony in patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure. Design : Prospective multicenter observation study. Setting : Intensive care units in three university hospitals. Methods: Patients consecutively admitted to ICU were included. NIV, performed with an ICU ventilator, was set by the clinician. Airway pressure, flow, and surface diaphragmatic electromyography were recorded continuously for 30min. Asynchrony events and the asynchrony index (AI) were determined from visual inspection of the recordings and clinical observation. Results: A total of 60 patients were included, 55% of whom were hypercapnic. Auto-triggering was present in 8 (13%) patients, double triggering in 9 (15%), ineffective breaths in 8 (13%), premature cycling 7 (12%) and late cycling in 14 (23%). An AI>10%, indicating severe asynchrony, was present in 26 patients (43%), whose median (25-75 IQR) AI was 26 (15-54%). A significant correlation was found between the magnitude of leaks and the number of ineffective breaths and severity of delayed cycling. Multivariate analysis indicated that the level of pressure support and the magnitude of leaks were weakly, albeit significantly, associated with an AI>10%. Patient comfort scale was higher in pts with an AI<10%. Conclusion: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common in patients receiving NIV for acute respiratory failure. Our results suggest that leaks play a major role in generating patient-ventilator asynchrony and discomfort, and point the way to further research to determine if ventilator functions designed to cope with leaks can reduce asynchrony in the clinical setting