Fulltext

In situ and in vitro comparison of laser fluorescence with visual inspection in detecting occlusal caries lesions

de Paula, Andréia ; Campos, Juliana ; Diniz, Michele ; Hebling, Josimeri ; Rodrigues, Jonas

In: Lasers in Medical Science, 2011, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 1-5

Zum persönliche Liste hinzufügen
    Titel
    • In situ and in vitro comparison of laser fluorescence with visual inspection in detecting occlusal caries lesions
    Autor
    • de Paula, Andréia. Department of Dental Materials, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
    • Campos, Juliana. Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil
    • Diniz, Michele. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil
    • Hebling, Josimeri. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil
    • Rodrigues, Jonas. Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
    Dokumententyp
    • Postprint
    Sprache
    • Englisch
    Veröffentlicht in
    • Lasers in Medical Science, 2011, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 1-5. Springer-Verlag
    Andere elektronische Ausgabe
    OAI-PMH-ID
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:310748
    Summary
    The aim of this study was to compare the in situ and in vitro performances of a laser fluorescence (LF) device (DIAGNOdent 2095) with visual inspection for the detection of occlusal caries in permanent teeth. Sixty-four sites were selected, and visual inspection and LF assessments were carried out, in vitro, three times by two independent examiners, with a 1-week interval between evaluations. Afterwards, the occlusal surfaces were mounted on the palatal portion of removable acrylic orthodontic appliances and placed in six volunteers. Assessments were repeated and validated by histological analysis of the tooth sections under a stereomicroscope. For both examiners, the highest intra-examiner values were observed for the visual inspection when in vitro and in situ evaluations were compared. The inter-examiner reproducibility varied from 0.61 to 0.64, except for the in vitro assessment using LF, which presented a lower value (0.43). The methods showed high specificity at the D1 threshold (considering enamel and dentin caries as disease). In vitro evaluations showed the highest values of sensitivity for both methods when compared to the in situ evaluations at D1 and D2 (considering only dentinal caries as the disease) thresholds. For both methods, the results of sensitivity (at D1 and D2) and accuracy (at D1) showed significant differences between in vitro and in situ conditions. However, the sensitivity (at D1 and D2), specificity and accuracy (both at D1) of the methods were not significantly different when the same condition was considered. It can be concluded that visual inspection and LF showed better performance in vitro than in situ