Fulltext

Evaluating the effect of network density and geometric distribution on kinematic source inversion models

Zhang, Youbing ; Dalguer, Luis A. ; Song, Seok Goo ; Clinton, John ; Giardini, Domenico

In: Geophysical Journal International, 2014, vol. 200, no. 1, p. 1-16

Zum persönliche Liste hinzufügen
    Titel
    • Evaluating the effect of network density and geometric distribution on kinematic source inversion models
    Autor
    • Zhang, Youbing. Swiss Seismological Service (SED), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: youbing.zhang@sed.ethz.ch
    • Dalguer, Luis A.. Swiss Seismological Service (SED), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: youbing.zhang@sed.ethz.ch
    • Song, Seok Goo. Swiss Seismological Service (SED), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: youbing.zhang@sed.ethz.ch
    • Clinton, John. Swiss Seismological Service (SED), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: youbing.zhang@sed.ethz.ch
    • Giardini, Domenico. Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Dokumententyp
    • Postprint
    Sprache
    • Englisch
    Veröffentlicht in
    • Geophysical Journal International, 2014, vol. 200, no. 1, p. 1-16. Oxford University Press
    Andere elektronische Ausgabe
    OAI-PMH-ID
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:289835
    Summary
    The effect of network density and geometric distribution on kinematic non-linear source inversion is investigated by inverting synthetic ground motions from a buried strike-slip fault (Mw 6.5), that have been generated by dynamic spontaneous rupture modelling. For the inversion, we use a physics-based regularized Yoffe function as slip velocity function. We test three different cases of station network geometry: (i) single station, varying azimuth and epicentral distance; (ii) multistation circular configurations, that is stations at similar distances from the fault, and regularly spaced around the fault; (iii) irregular multistation configurations using different numbers of stations. Our results show: (1) single station tests suggest that it may be possible to obtain a relatively good source model even using a single station. The best source model using a single station is obtained with stations at which amplitude ratios between three components are not large. We infer that both azimuthal angle and source-to-station distance play an important role in the design of optimal seismic network for source inversion. (2) Multistation tests show that the quality of the inverted source systematically correlates neither with the number of stations, nor with waveform misfit. (3) Waveform misfit has a direct correlation with the number of stations, resulting in overfitting the observed data without any systematic improvement of the source. It suggests that the best source model is not necessarily derived from the model with minimum waveform misfit. (4) A seismic network with a small number of well-spaced stations around the fault may be sufficient to obtain acceptable source inversion