In: Behavioral Ecology, 1996, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 292-298
|
In: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2003, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 810-817
|
In: Behavioral Ecology, 2006, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 375-383
|
In: Behavioral Ecology, 1998, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 267-278
|
In: Behavioral Ecology, 2007, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 272-278
|
In: Behavioral Ecology, 1995, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 102-108
|
In: Environmental Entomology, 2003, vol. 32, no. 6, p. 1329-1336
|
In: Bioinformatics, 2011, vol. 27, no. 24, p. 3425-3426
|
In: Behavioral Ecology, 2002, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 28-31
|
In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2009, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 134 - 142
To date very few studies have addressed the effects of inbreeding in social Hymenoptera, perhaps because the costs of inbreeding are generally considered marginal owing to male haploidy whereby recessive deleterious alleles are strongly exposed to selection in males. Here, we present one of the first studies on the effects of queen and worker homozygosity on colony performance. In a wild...
|