In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2011, vol. 125, no. 3, p. 359-366
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2013, vol. 127, no. 2, p. 427-435
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, vol. 126, no. 4, p. 505-512
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, vol. 126, no. 3, p. 407-413
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2009, vol. 123, no. 5, p. 427-430
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 464-474
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, vol. 29, no. 8, p. 777-781
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 426-431
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, vol. 29, no. 5, p. 327-338
|
In: Drug Testing and Analysis, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1-2, p. 155–163
Some forensic and clinical circumstances require knowledge of the frequency of drug use. Care of the patient, administrative, and legal consequences will be different if the subject is a regular or an occasional cannabis smoker. To this end, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) has been proposed as a criterion to help to distinguish between these two groups of users. However, to...
|