In: Brain Topography, 2010, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 119-127
|
In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2015, vol. 27, no. 10, p. 1968–1980
Interactions between stimuli's acoustic features and experience-based internal models of the environment enable listeners to compensate for the disruptions in auditory streams that are regularly encountered in noisy environments. However, whether auditory gaps are filled in predictively or restored a posteriori remains unclear. The current lack of positive statistical evidence that internal...
|
In: Brain, 2015, vol. 138, no. 5, p. 1160-1166
|
In: The Journal of Neuroscience, 2011, vol. 31, no. 49, p. 17971-17981
Behavioral and brain responses to identical stimuli can vary with experimental and task parameters, including the context of stimulus presentation or attention. More surprisingly, computational models suggest that noise-related random fluctuations in brain responses to stimuli would alone be sufficient to engender perceptual differences between physically identical stimuli. In two experiments...
|
In: Cerebral Cortex, 2010, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1676-1684
|
In: Brain, 2013, vol. 136, no. 1, p. 81-89
|
In: Brain, 2013, vol. 136, no. 1, p. 81-89
Auditory evoked potentials are informative of intact cortical functions of comatose patients. The integrity of auditory functions evaluated using mismatch negativity paradigms has been associated with their chances of survival. However, because auditory discrimination is assessed at various delays after coma onset, it is still unclear whether this impairment depends on the time of the...
|
In: Brain, 2015, vol. 138, no. 12, p. e396-e396
|
In: Brain, 2016, vol. 139, no. 6, p. e32-e32
|
