In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2014, vol. 128, no. 1, p. 95-103
|
In: Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 2014, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 518-525
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2014, vol. 128, no. 1, p. 73-82
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2014, vol. 128, no. 4, p. 615-620
|
In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2014, vol. 128, no. 3, p. 577-577
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 464-474
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, vol. 29, no. 8, p. 777-781
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 426-431
|
In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, vol. 29, no. 5, p. 327-338
|
In: Drug Testing and Analysis, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1-2, p. 155–163
Some forensic and clinical circumstances require knowledge of the frequency of drug use. Care of the patient, administrative, and legal consequences will be different if the subject is a regular or an occasional cannabis smoker. To this end, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) has been proposed as a criterion to help to distinguish between these two groups of users. However, to...
|