In: Research handbook on international law and cities, 2021, p. 341-353
|
In: Leçon inaugurale, édition électronique (Open Edition books), 2021, p. 1-24
|
In: AJIL Unbound (American Journal of International Law), 2021, vol. 115, p. 307-311
|
In: Revue européenne du droit (RED), 2021, no. 2, p. 64-68
|
In: The Oxford Handbook of Global Justice, 2020, p. 99-121
International human rights law and practice reveal an ambivalent approach to the personal scope of human rights: human rights are often less equal or general than they claim and are claimed to be. The inequalities of human rights are of two kinds: some vulnerable individuals are also protected by special rights, thus drawing an internal boundary within the scope of human rights-holders, while...
|
In: Jus Cogens: a critical journal of philosophy of law and politics (online), 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1-28
International law’s legitimacy has come under serious attack lately, including, and maybe even more so, in regimes considered democratic. Reading Dworkin’s New Philosophy for International Law in the current context is a timely reminder of the centrality of the political legitimacy of international law. Interestingly, indeed, his account does not succumb to the (however progressive)...
|
In: EJIL Talk : Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 2020, p. 1-4
|
In: The Challenge of Inter-Legality, 2019, p. 91-132
|
In: The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Righs: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric, 2020, p. 481-489
|
In: Swiss Review of International and European Law, 2019, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 525-547
|