Fulltext

A comment on the article "A collinearity diagnosis of the GNSS geocenter determination” by P.Rebischung, Z.Altamimi, and T.Springer

Meindl, Michael ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Thaller, Daniela ; Dach, Rolf ; Schaer, Stefan ; Jäggi, Adrian

In: Journal of Geodesy, 2015, vol. 89, no. 2, p. 189-194

Ajouter à la liste personnelle
    Titre
    • A comment on the article "A collinearity diagnosis of the GNSS geocenter determination” by P.Rebischung, Z.Altamimi, and T.Springer
    Auteur
    • Meindl, Michael. ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Robert-Gnehm-Weg 15, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland
    • Beutler, Gerhard. University of Bern, Astronomical Institute, Sidlerstr.5, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
    • Thaller, Daniela. Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Richard-Strauss-Allee 11, 60598, Frankfurt, Germany
    • Dach, Rolf. University of Bern, Astronomical Institute, Sidlerstr.5, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
    • Schaer, Stefan. Federal Office of Topography, Seftigenstrasse 264, 3084, Wabern, Switzerland
    • Jäggi, Adrian. University of Bern, Astronomical Institute, Sidlerstr.5, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
    Type de document
    • Postprint
    Langue
    • Anglais
    Publié dans
    • Journal of Geodesy, 2015, vol. 89, no. 2, p. 189-194. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
    Autre version électronique
    Identifiant OAI-PMH
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:333041
    Summary
    Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047-1064, 2013) showed that the geocenter $$z$$ z -component estimated from observations of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is strongly correlated to a particular parameter of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model developed by Beutler et al. (Manuscr Geod 19:367-386, 1994). They analyzed the forces caused by SRP and the impact on the satellites' orbits. The authors achieved their results using perturbation theory and celestial mechanics. Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026 , 2013) also deal with the geocenter determination with GNSS. The authors carried out a collinearity diagnosis of the associated parameter estimation problem. They conclude "without much exaggerating that current GNSS are insensitive to any component of geocenter motion”. They explain this inability by the high degree of collinearity of the geocenter coordinates mainly with satellite clock corrections. Based on these results and additional experiments, they state that the conclusions drawn by Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047-1064, 2013) are questionable. We do not agree with these conclusions and present our arguments in this article. In the first part, we review and highlight the main characteristics of the studies performed by Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047-1064, 2013) to show that the experiments are quite different from those performed by Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026 ,2013) . In the second part, we show that normal equation (NEQ) systems are regular when estimating geocenter coordinates, implying that the covariance matrices associated with the NEQ systems may be used to assess the sensitivity to geocenter coordinates in a standard way. The sensitivity of GNSS to the components of the geocenter is discussed. Finally, we comment on the arguments raised by Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026 , 2013) against the results of Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047-1064, 2013).