Fulltext

Analytical and clinical performance of the new Fujirebio 25-OH vitamin D assay, a comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and three other automated assays

Saleh, Lanja ; Mueller, Daniel ; von Eckardstein, Arnold

In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2016, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 617-625

Add to personal list
    Title
    • Analytical and clinical performance of the new Fujirebio 25-OH vitamin D assay, a comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and three other automated assays
    Author
    • Saleh, Lanja. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    • Mueller, Daniel. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    • von Eckardstein, Arnold. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Document Type
    • Postprint
    Language
    • English
    Published in
    • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2016, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 617-625. De Gruyter
    Other Version
    OAI-PMH Identifier
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:325539
    Summary
    Background: We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the new Lumipulse® G 25-OH vitamin D assay from Fujirebio, and compared it to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method and three other commercial automated assays. Methods: Total 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured in 100 selected serum samples from our routine analysis with Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay. The results were compared with those obtained with LC-MS/MS and three other automated 25(OH)D assays (Abbott, Beckman, and Roche). The accuracy of each assay tested was evaluated against a Labquality reference serum panel for 25(OH)D (Ref!25OHD; University of Ghent). Results: Intra- and inter-day imprecision of the Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay was <5%. Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay showed the highest correlation among the assays tested with the LC-MS/MS method (R=0.986). The mean relative bias obtained was -15.6% (Fujirebio), -12.7% (Beckman), -2.1% (Abbott) and 9.7% (Roche) as compared to LC-MS/MS. Comparison with the Labquality certified reference serum panel yielded a mean bias of -11.8% (Fujirebio), -14.1% (Beckman), 4.4% (Abbott) and 3.2% (Roche), respectively. Compared to LC-MS/MS, the sensitivity of different methods in detecting vitamin D insufficiency (<50 nmol/L) varied from 100% for the Fujirebio assay to 72.7% for Roche, and specificity ranged from 94.4% for Roche to 87.6% for Beckman. Conclusions: The Lumipulse G 25-OH vitamin D assay from Fujirebio demonstrated a good correlation with LC-MS/MS and some immunoassays. The performance of the assay is well-suited for routine 25(OH)D measurement in clinical serum samples. A correction for the observed negative bias vs. LC-MS/MS could be considered.