Fulltext

Patients' Preferences on Information and Involvement in Decision Making for Gastrointestinal Surgery

Uldry, Emilie ; Schäfer, Markus ; Saadi, Alend ; Rousson, Valentin ; Demartines, Nicolas

In: World Journal of Surgery, 2013, vol. 37, no. 9, p. 2162-2171

Zum persönliche Liste hinzufügen
    Titel
    • Patients' Preferences on Information and Involvement in Decision Making for Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Autor
    • Uldry, Emilie. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Schäfer, Markus. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Saadi, Alend. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Rousson, Valentin. Statistical Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Demartines, Nicolas. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Dokumententyp
    • Postprint
    Sprache
    • Englisch
    Veröffentlicht in
    • World Journal of Surgery, 2013, vol. 37, no. 9, p. 2162-2171. Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com
    Andere elektronische Ausgabe
    Klassifikation
    • Gesundheit
    OAI-PMH-ID
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:322529
    Summary
    Background: The relationship between physicians and patients has undergone important changes, and the current emancipation of patients has led to a real partnership in medical decision making. The present study aimed to assess patients' preferences on different aspects of decision making during treatment and potential complications, as well as the amount and type of preoperative information wanted before visceral surgery. Methods: This was a prospective non-randomized study based on a questionnaire given to 253 consecutive patients scheduled for elective gastrointestinal surgery. Results: In considering surgical complications or treatment in the intensive care unit, 64% of patients wished to take an active role in any medical decisions. The respective figures for cardiac resuscitation and treatment limitations were 89 and 60%. As for information, 73, 77, and 47% of patients wish detailed information, information on a potential ICU hospitalization, and knowledge of cardiac resuscitation, respectively. Elderly and low-educated patients were significantly less interested in shared medical decision making (p=0.003 and 0.015), and in receiving information (p=0.03 and 0.05). Similarly, involvement of the family in decision making was significantly less important to elderly and male patients (p=0.05 and 0.03, respectively). Neither the type of operation (minor or major) nor the severity of disease (malignancies versus non-malignancies) was a significant factor for shared decision making, information, or family involvement. Conclusions: The vast majority of surgical patients clearly want to get adequate preoperative information about their disease and the planned treatment. They also consider it crucial to be involved in any kind of decision making for treatment and complications. For most patients, the family role is limited to supporting the treating physicians if the patient is unable to participate in decision making