Fulltext

A novel computer test to assess driving-relevant cognitive functions - a pilot study

Bieri, Rahel ; Jäger, Michael ; Gruber, Nicole ; Nef, Tobias ; Müri, René M. ; Mosimann, Urs P.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, 2014, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 229-238

Ajouter à la liste personnelle
    Titre
    • A novel computer test to assess driving-relevant cognitive functions - a pilot study
    Auteur
    • Bieri, Rahel. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • Jäger, Michael. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • Gruber, Nicole. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • Nef, Tobias. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • Müri, René M.. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • Mosimann, Urs P.. Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    Type de document
    • Postprint
    Langue
    • Anglais
    Publié dans
    • International Psychogeriatrics, 2014, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 229-238. Cambridge University Press
    Autre version électronique
    Identifiant OAI-PMH
    • oai:doc.rero.ch:301487
    Summary
    ABSTRACT Background: The assessment of driving-relevant cognitive functions in older drivers is a difficult challenge as there is no clear-cut dividing line between normal cognition and impaired cognition and not all cognitive functions are equally important for driving. Methods: To support decision makers, the Bern Cognitive Screening Test (BCST) for older drivers was designed. It is a computer-assisted test battery assessing visuo-spatial attention, executive functions, eye-hand coordination, distance judgment, and speed regulation. Here we compare the performance in BCST with the performance in paper and pencil cognitive screening tests and the performance in the driving simulator testing of 41 safe drivers (without crash history) and 14 unsafe drivers (with crash history). Results: Safe drivers performed better than unsafe drivers in BCST (Mann-Whitney U test: U = 125.5; p = 0.001) and in the driving simulator (Student's t-test: t(44) = -2.64, p = 0.006). No clear group differences were found in paper and pencil screening tests (p > 0.05; ns). BCST was best at identifying older unsafe drivers (sensitivity 86%; specificity 61%) and was also better tolerated than the driving simulator test with fewer dropouts. Conclusions: BCST is more accurate than paper and pencil screening tests, and better tolerated than driving simulator testing when assessing driving-relevant cognition in older drivers