Accès public à partir du 1 oct. 2020

Vers une anthropologie universelle ? La crise galate : fragile gestion de l'ethnicité juive

Butticaz, Simon

In: New Testament Studies, 2015, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 505-524

Ajouter à la liste personnelle
    Summary
    Traditionally, Pauline exegesis has tended to reduce the Judaism which the apostle encounters in his argumentation to a legalist and particularistic religion; a religion from which Paul would have distanced himself, inventing a Christianity of universal grace in his critique of the Torah. If the New Perspective on Paul allowed us to correct this legalistic reduction of Second Temple Judaism, by highlighting the dimension of election with the foundation of the covenant of Israel, the instigators of this exegetical programme have, however, assented to the hypothesis of a supersession of Jewish particularism by Christian universalism. Hence the critique voiced on this issue by the adherents of what is now called the Radical New Perspective. We are especially indebted to Denise Kimber Buell and Caroline Johnson Hodge for this wave of protest, for both authors identify the use of an ‘ethnic reasoning' in the Pauline reworking of the Gentiles' identity. While this critique deserves to be heard, the thesis of a logic of ethnicity and kinship at work under the pen of the apostle cannot be ratified without discussion, since it is not consistent with a rigorous examination of the letter to the Galatians. In that context, indeed, the discourse of identity is not mainly ethnic but anthropological and cosmological, since the believers - Jews quite as much as Gentiles - through baptism have to become not a ‘new people' but rather a ‘new creation' (Gal 6.15)