000028984 001__ 28984
000028984 005__ 20160407123803.0
000028984 0248_ $$aoai:doc.rero.ch:20120420153707-UB$$ppostprint$$prero_explore$$particle$$zcdu34$$zthesis_urn$$zreport$$zthesis$$zcdu59$$zbook$$zjournal$$zcdu16$$zpreprint$$zcdu1$$zdissertation$$zunine
000028984 041__ $$aeng
000028984 080__ $$a59
000028984 100__ $$aOates, Jennifer$$uEvolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
000028984 245__ $$9eng$$aRoving and Service Quality in the Cleaner Wrasse Labroides bicolor
000028984 269__ $$c2010
000028984 520__ $$9eng$$aThe cleaner wrasse <i>Labroides dimidiatus</i> occupies fixed ‘cleaning stations’ on coral reefs, which ‘client’ reef fish visit repeatedly to have parasites removed. Conflict arises because cleaners prefer to cheat by feeding on client mucus instead of parasites. Clients can prevent <i>L. dimidiatus</i> from always cheating using control mechanisms such as chasing and partner switching, which depend on repeated interactions. These control mechanisms would be undermined in the absence of frequent repeated interactions, if cleaners roved over large areas. Roving behaviour has been anecdotally described for the closely related cleaner wrasse <i>Labroides bicolor</i>. Here we report field data comparing these two species in Moorea, French Polynesia. Our results confirmed that <i>L. bicolor</i> home ranges are much larger than <i>L. dimidiatus</i> home ranges, and showed that cleaning interactions occurred all over the <i>L. bicolor</i> home range: home range of cleaning interactions increased with total home range size. Moreover, we found that cleaner initiation of interactions increased with home range size in <i>L. bicolor</i>, which would give <i>L. bicolor</i> with large home ranges additional leverage to increase cheating. In line with these results, we found that client jolt rate (used as a measure of cheating) was higher among clients of cleaners with large home ranges. Our results emphasise the importance of game structure and control over initiating interactions as parameters in determining the nature of interactions in mutualisms.
000028984 700__ $$aManica, Andrea$$uEvolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
000028984 700__ $$aBshary, Redouan$$uLaboratoire d'éco-éthologie, Institut de Biologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
000028984 773__ $$dWiley$$g2010/216/4/309–315$$tEthology
000028984 775__ $$gPublished Version$$ohttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01742.x
000028984 8564_ $$fOates_Jennifer_-_Roving_and_Service_Quality_in_the_Cleaner_20120420153707-UB.pdf$$qapplication/pdf$$s1068258$$uhttp://doc.rero.ch/record/28984/files/Oates_Jennifer_-_Roving_and_Service_Quality_in_the_Cleaner_20120420153707-UB.pdf$$yorder:1$$zTexte intégral
000028984 918__ $$aFaculté des sciences$$bRue Emile-Argand 11, 2007 Neuchâtel$$cInstitut de biologie
000028984 919__ $$aUniversité de Neuchâtel$$bNeuchâtel$$ddoc.support@rero.ch
000028984 980__ $$aPOSTPRINT$$bUNINE$$fART_JOURNAL
000028984 990__ $$a20120420153707-UB